Study Will Make Storm Forecasting More Accurate
Hello
reader!
It
follows an article published on day (07/22) in the english website of the Agência
FAPESP noting that study will make Storm Forecasting more accurate.
Duda Falcão
NEWS
Study Will Make Storm
Forecasting More Accurate
By
Karina Toledo
July 22,
2015
(Photo:
Wikimedia Commons)
Real and
simulated data were compared using an innovative
tracking technique that
computed the sizes and lifetimes of cloud
and rain cells, comparing simulated
clouds with satellite and radar data.
|
Agência FAPESP – In a
study recently published by Monthly Weather Review, a team of French and Brazilian
researchers identified and corrected a flaw in the mathematical models used to
simulate cloud and rain formation processes.
According to the authors, the study will make storm
forecasting more precise. “We compared a simulation produced by a
high-resolution model with observational data collected in 2012 in Santa Maria,
a town in Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil. The region has some of the most
severe storms on earth,” said Luiz Augusto Toledo Machado, a researcher at
Brazil’s National Space Research Institute (INPE).
“We noticed that many small clouds appearing in the
model weren’t in fact observed using satellites and rain radars,” Machado
added. “So we decided to investigate why this was so.” The study was part of a Thematic Project supported
by FAPESP and coordinated by Machado.
The Santa Maria data collection operation was carried
out for a major scientific campaign held from 2010-14 as part of Project CHUVA (meaning
“rain”). Its aim was to understand the physical processes that take place
inside clouds, including variations in droplet size and other features of rain
and cloud cells such as the proportions of water and ice, and the development
of lightning and thunderstorms. All of this research is considered important to
improve extreme event forecasting (read more at http://agencia.fapesp.br/20579/).
The storms that typically form in this part of
southern Brazil, Machado explained, are classed as mesoscale convective
complexes (MCCs), and they were simulated using a French model called Meso-NH,
short for non-hydrostatic mesoscale atmospheric model.
The study described in MWR was a collaboration between
Machado and Jean-Pierre Chaboureau, a physicist at the CNRS Aerology Laboratory
in Toulouse, France.
“The regional models that simulate cloud formation
typically work with a scale of about 10 km, meaning they can generate data for
points 10 km apart. Meso-NH generates data every 2 km, which is high-resolution
in the sense that clouds can be simulated more precisely. This is the way to go
in future. It will let us forecast rain in particular neighborhoods of a city,
for example,” Machado said.
Real and simulated data were compared using an
innovative tracking technique that computed the size and lifetime of cloud and
rain distributions. Histograms enabled the researchers to compare the
dimensions of simulated clouds with those of clouds observed via satellite and
radar.
When they investigated mismatches between the
simulated and real data, the researchers discovered that the model did not
accurately represent entrainment, the mixture of environmental air into air
currents and clouds.
“Entrainment occurs when a turbulent flow captures a
non-turbulent flow. In the model, turbulence was parameterized in one
dimension. We created a 3D parameterization and slightly increased the mixing
length, which is the average distance an inbound air parcel travels before
interacting with an air parcel inside the cloud,” Machado said.
The modifications made the distribution of simulated
and actual cloud sizes and heights more similar. “This will undoubtedly have an
impact on the quality of rainfall forecasting. We showed in a case study that
accuracy increases when turbulence is corrected,” Machado said.
Previous studies had suggested that similar problems
with other mathematical models of cloud formation could be remedied using this
approach.
The article was one of the first produced by Project
CHUVA, which included data collection campaigns in the cities of Alcântara
(Maranhão), Fortaleza (Ceará), Belém (Pará), São José dos Campos (São Paulo)
and Manaus (Amazonas), besides Santa Maria (Rio Grande do Sul). The regions
chosen for the field research represent the different precipitation regimes
found in Brazil.
Source:
English Website of the Agência FAPESP
Comentários
Postar um comentário